Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Benjamin Woodhouse v. United States Government, et al
as 22-55636
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BENJAMIN WOODHOUSE, A Citizen of the United States, Resident of the U.S. Virgin Islands
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT, STANLEY BLUMENFELD, Jr., US District Court Judge, R. GARY KLAUSNER, United States District Court Judge and others
Benjamin Woodhouse, et al v. United States Government, et al
as 22-55598
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BENJAMIN WOODHOUSE, A Citizen of the United States, Resident of the U.S. Virgin Islands and HAVENSIGHT CAPITAL L.L.C., a U.S. Virgin Islands corporation
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT, STANLEY BLUMENFELD, Jr., US District Court Judge, GIBSON DUNN, INC., A California Corporation and others
Benjamin Woodhouse, et al v. United States Government, et al
as 22-55463
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BENJAMIN WOODHOUSE, A Citizen of the United States, Resident of the U.S. Virgin Islands and HAVENSIGHT CAPITAL L.L.C., a U.S. Virgin Islands corporation
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT, STANLEY BLUMENFELD, Jr., US District Court Judge, GIBSON DUNN, INC., A California Corporation and others
Alper Karaali v. Joseph Halbach, et al
as 16-20140
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ALPER KARAALI
Defendant - Appellee:
JOSEPH TODD HALBACH, 333rd Civil District Court Judge and STUART WILSON, Arbitrator, Mediator
Carpenter v. Aberdeen Collection, et al
as 15-6002
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM D. CARPENTER
Defendant - Appellee:
ABERDEEN COLLECTION ENTERPRISES, II, COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, known and unknown at this time, in their individual and official capacities, COURT CLERK, known and unknown at this time, in the individual and official capacity and others
Carpenter v. Aberdeen Collection Enterprises et al
as 5:2014cv00958
Plaintiff:
William D Carpenter
Defendant:
Aberdeen Collection Enterprises, Tulsa County District Court Judges, Court Clerk and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
