Cases 1 - 10 of 2,254
KHALEEL v. BLINKEN et al
as 1:2024cv01802
Plaintiff:
ASIF N. KHALEEL
Defendant:
ANTONY J. BLINKEN, RENA BITTER, ANDREW SCHOFER and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
KEARNEY v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al
as 1:2024cv01793
Plaintiff:
ERICA KEARNEY
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPARTMENT, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
ALI v. BLINKEN et al
as 1:2024cv01722
Plaintiff:
JALIL ALI
Defendant:
ANTONY J. BLINKEN, RENA BITTER, MATTHEW PALMER and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
SADIQ v. BLINKEN et al
as 1:2024cv01693
Plaintiff:
REHAN SADIQ
Defendant:
ANTONY J. BLINKEN, RENA BITTER, THATCHER SCHARPF and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
DiLELLA et al v. BURCHARD et al
as 1:2024cv01675
Plaintiff:
DANIEL M DILELLA and FRANK GIORDANO
Defendant:
RENEE BURCHARD, KIRSTI GARLOCK, ANNA LAYMON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
JERNIGAN et al v. BLINKEN et al
as 1:2024cv01666
Plaintiff:
LARIS BRITTON JERNIGAN, XUAN THI TRAN and NHAN QUANG BAO TRAN
Defendant:
ANTONY J. BLINKEN, RENA BITTER, SUSAN BURNS and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
TAYLOR v. ROBERTS et al
as 1:2024cv01643
Plaintiff:
CHARMAIN TAYLOR
Defendant:
TARIQUE ROBERTS and JOHN DOE
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01629
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
STRIKE 3 HOLDINGS, LLC. v. DOE
as 1:2024cv01582
Plaintiff:
STRIKE 3 HOLDINGS, LLC.
Defendant:
JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
STRIKE 3 HOLDINGS, LLC. v. DOE
as 1:2024cv01583
Plaintiff:
STRIKE 3 HOLDINGS, LLC.
Defendant:
JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
