Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Labor Saving Systems Ltd. v. Does 1-79
as 4:2021cv01389
Not Classified By Court:
Does 1-79
Plaintiff:
LABOR SAVING SYSTEMS LTD d/b/a Magnepull, and Labor Saving Systems Ltd. doing business as Magnepull
Defendant:
Harbor Freight Tools USA, Inc., Harbor Freight Tools USA Inc, Doe 3 4:21-cv-1389 and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126 Patent Infringement
MedARC LLC v. Cannon Cochran Management Services Inc et al
as 3:2020cv02953
Debtor:
Revolution Monitoring Management LLC, Revolution Neuromonitoring LLC and Revolution Monitoring LLC
Plaintiff:
MedARC LLC
Defendant:
Cannon Cochran Management Services Inc, Doe 1 through Doe 10 and Does 1 - 10
Not Classified By Court:
Case Admin Sup and Harlin D Hale
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
MedARC LLC v. Care Improvement Plus Group Management LLC et al
as 3:2020cv02949
Debtor:
Revolution Monitoring Management LLC, Revolution Neuromonitoring LLC and Revolution Monitoring LLC
Defendant:
Care Improvement Plus Group Management LLC and Doe 1 through Doe 10
Plaintiff:
MedARC, LLC
Not Classified By Court:
Harlin D Hale and Case Admin Sup
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
MedARC LLC v. Entrust LLC et al
as 3:2020cv02948
Debtor:
Revolution Monitoring Management LLC, Revolution Neuromonitoring LLC and Revolution Monitoring LLC
Plaintiff:
MedARC LLC
Defendant:
Entrust LLC and Doe 1 through Doe 10
Not Classified By Court:
Case Admin Sup and Harlin D Hale
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Scott v. Taylor County et al
as 1:2017cv00121
Plaintiff:
Ken David Scott
Defendant:
Taylor County, TX, Ricky Bishop, Taylor County Sheriff's Office and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Lockamy v. Unnamed officers of John Montford Unit et al
as 5:2008cv00021
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Alden Lockamy
Defendant:
Unnamed officers of John Montford Unit, John Doe #1, John Doe #2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
