Cases filed in the Second Circuit Courts
Cases 31 - 39 of 39
Klauber Brothers, Inc. v. Retail Royalty Company et al
as 1:2013cv06826
Plaintiff: Klauber Brothers, Inc.
Defendant: Retail Royalty Company, American Eagle Outfitters, AE Direct Co., LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Crossbridge Projects Limited v. IOF PTE LTD Singapore et al
as 1:2012cv06880
Plaintiff: Crossbridge Projects Limited
Defendant: IOF PTE LTD Singapore, Bhatia International Ltd Indore, Bhatia International PTE Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333
Type: Contract Marine
D/S Norden A/S v. IOF Pte. Ltd. et al
as 1:2012cv06030
Plaintiff: D/S Norden A/S
Defendant: IOF Pte. Ltd., Bhatia International Pte. Ltd., Bhatia International Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333
Type: Contract Marine
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2012cv05198
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Government Employees Insurance v. Infinity Health Products, Ltd.
as 12-2197
Plaintiff - Appellee: Government Employees Insurance Co., Geico Indemnity Co., Geico General Insurance Company and others
Defendant: Infinity Health Products, Ltd., ILya Mugerman, MSSA Corp. and others
Defendant - Appellant: Oksana Kovalenko
Home Gambling Network, Inc. et al v. Ho et al
as 1:2011cv02975
Plaintiff: Home Gambling Network, Inc. and Mel Molnick
Defendant: Stanley Ho, Peter Kjaer, Angela Ho and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Walsh v. Family Aides Certified Services of New York City, Inc. et al
as 1:2011cv00891
Defendant: Arent Fox LLP, Brooklyn Grantor Trust, Family Aides Certified Services of New York City, Inc. and others
Plaintiff: Deborah Walsh
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Government Employees Insurance Co. et al v. Infinity Health Products, Ltd. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2010cv05611
Defendant: Aleksander Afanasyev, Amega Inc., Betty Andresol and others
Plaintiff: Geico Casualty Co., Geico General Insurance Company, Geico Indemnity Co. and others
Indentity Not Presently Known But Intended To Be The Owner Of Viss Supply, Inc: John Doe 1
Identity Not Presently Known But Intended To Be The Owner Of West Coast, Inc: John Doe 10
Identity Not Presently Known But Intended To Be The Owner Of Chesteron, Inc: John Doe 11
Identity Not Presently Known But Intended To Be The Owner Of Tita Co: John Doe 12
Identity Not Presently Known But Intended To Be The Owner Of Bilt-Rite Orthopedics & Safety, Inc: John Doe 13
Identity Not Presently Known But Intended To Be The Owner Of Wellcore Wholesale, Inc: John Doe 14
Identity Not Presently Known But Intended To Be The Owner Of Galasa, Inc: John Doe 15
Identity Not Presently Known But Intended To Be The Owner Of Eco Wholesale, Inc: John Doe 2
Identity Not Presently Known But Intended To Be The Owner Of Mikos Trading, Inc: John Doe 3
Identity Not Presently Known But Intended To Be The Owner Of MDSS Wholesale, Inc: John Doe 4
Identity Not Presently Known But Intended To Be The Owner Of Excell Plus, Inc: John Doe 5
Identity Not Presently Known But Intended To Be The Owner Of Riviera Wholesale, Inc: John Doe 6
Identity Not Presently Known But Intended To Be The Owner Of Optom Inc: John Doe 7
Identity Not Presently Known But Intended To Be The Owner Of Delazoom, Inc: John Doe 8
Identity Not Presently Known But Intended To Be The Owner Of New Step Services, Inc: John Doe 9
Identity Not Presently Known But Intended To Be The Owner Of John Doe Corporations 1-10: John Does 16-25
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Mitsubishi Electric Corporation et al v. Target Corporation and Doe Corporations 1-10
as 7:2008cv03689
Plaintiff: Mitsubishi Electric Corporation, Mitsubishi Electric Corporation, Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. and others
Defendant: Target Corporation and Doe Corporations 1-10
Cause Of Action: Federal Question

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?