Cases 51 - 60 of 150
Helix Electric, Inc. v. DCK Pacific Construction, LLC et al
as 1:2016cv00265
Plaintiff:
Helix Electric, Inc.
Defendant:
DCK Pacific Construction, LLC, State of Hawaii, Department of Transportation, John Does 1-20 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv00154
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 623
Pair v. Kipu Ranch Adventures, LLC
as 1:2016cv00139
Plaintiff:
Tammy Pair and Chris Pair
Defendant:
Kipu Ranch Adventures, LLC, John Does 1-20, Jane Does 1-20 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv00109
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv00085
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Chad Barnes v. Sea Hawaii Rafting, LLC, et al
as 16-15023
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHAD BARRY BARNES
Defendant - Appellee:
SEA HAWAII RAFTING, LLC, KRIS HENRY, JOHN DOES 1-20 and others
Makua et al v. Truston Technologies, Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv00540
Plaintiff:
David B. Makua, III , Cesario T. Gaspar and Willie C. Antonio
Defendant:
Truston Technologies, Inc., Healy Tibbitts Builders, Inc., Weeks Marine, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Michaud v. Manu Kai, LLC; et al.
as 1:2015cv00438
Plaintiff:
David L. Michaud
Defendant:
United States of America , Manu Kai, LLC, Ke'aki Technologies, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00392
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Salem v. Arakawa
as 1:2015cv00384
Plaintiff:
Christopher Salem
Defendant:
Alan Arakawa , Roe Governmental Entities 1-20, Doe Partnerships 1-20 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
