Cases 21 - 30 of 30
Gardner v. Ah Loo et al
as 1:2010cv00283
Plaintiff:
Colin Derek Gardner
Defendant:
Samuel Ah Loo , L. Kaupalolo , Maui, County of and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv00098
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv00054
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv00019
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Silva et al v. City and County of Honolulu et al
as 1:2009cv00479
Plaintiff:
Alika Poe Silva, Henry Kila Hopfe, Glen Kila and others
Defendant:
City and County of Honolulu, Department of Parks and Recreation for the City and County of Honolulu, Lester K.C. Chang and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Beed v. Marriott International, Inc. et al
as 1:2007cv00611
Plaintiff:
Darci A. Beed
Defendant:
Marriott International, Inc., Salvador Hernandez, Jr., John Does 1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv00333
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv00179
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv00173
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv00146
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
