Cases 1 - 10 of 41
Skinner v. Doerer
as 3:2024cv06653
Respondent:
J. Doerer
Petitioner:
Anthony Skinner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
(PC) Benanti v. Doerer
as 1:2024cv01108
Plaintiff:
Matthew Higgins-Vogt, Aaron M. Carrion and Michael Benanti
Defendant:
J. Doerer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
(HC) Manns v. Doerer
as 1:2024cv01107
Respondent:
Doerer
Petitioner:
Tony Manns
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Abdirashid Haret v. J. Doerer
as 5:2024cv01878
Petitioner:
Abdirashid Haret
Respondent:
J. Doerer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Jesus Blanco Barrios v. J. Doerer et al
as 5:2024cv01826
Respondent:
United States Attorney General, Federal Bureau of Prisons and Warden J. Doerer
Petitioner:
Jesus Blanco Barrios
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Albert Raul Franco v. Jacob Doerer
as 5:2024cv01779
Petitioner:
Albert Raul Franco
Respondent:
Jacob Doerer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Tayan Jackson v. J. Doerer et al
as 5:2024cv01717
Defendant:
Brigitte Wolverton, Mr. Barnes, J. Doerer and others
Plaintiff:
Tayan Jackson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Divine Son Irvis v. J. Doerer
as 5:2024cv01708
Respondent:
J. Doerer
Petitioner:
Divine Son Irvis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Manuel Aleman Jr. v. J. Doerer
as 5:2024cv01691
Petitioner:
Manuel Aleman Jr.
Respondent:
J. Doerer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Joshua Thomas Stetzer v. J. Doerer
as 5:2024cv01668
Respondent:
J. Doerer
Petitioner:
Joshua Thomas Stetzer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
