Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Britt v. Durham et al
as 1:2024cv00118
Defendant:
Chandler Durham, Turbo the Great, Warner-Chappell Music, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Jamal Britt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
Amazon.com, Inc. et al v. Digital Home Solutions LLC et al
as 1:2023cv05175
Plaintiff:
Amazon.com, Inc., Amazon.com Services LLC and Amazon Technologies, Inc.
Defendant:
Digital Home Solutions LLC, Joti Applee Dhillon and Does 1-50
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338 Trademark Infringement
Mayton et al v. Think Its a Game Records, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv02181
Plaintiff:
Justin Mayton, Terrell Perry, Camron Hubbard and others
Defendant:
Think Its a Game Records, Inc., Empire Distribution, Inc., Warner Music Group and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338 Copyright Infringement
Archer v. Holmes et al
as 1:2017cv02051
Plaintiff:
Arsenio Archer
Defendant:
London Holmes, 300 Entertainment LLC, BMG Gold Songs and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
Delta Air Lines, Inc. v. John Does 1-50
as 1:2013cv03388
Plaintiff:
Delta Air Lines, Inc.
Defendant:
John Does 1-50
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Hall v. Harvey Mason Media, Inc. et al
as 1:2011cv02978
Plaintiff:
Mason Hall and Mason Hall doing business as Break Bread Music
Defendant:
Harvey Mason Media, Inc., Lions Gate Entertainment, Corporation, Lions Gate Films. Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Pandora Jewelry, LLC v. Chandlee, Inc. et al
as 3:2009cv00019
Plaintiff:
Pandora Jewelry, LLC
Defendant:
Chandlee, Inc. and Does 1-50
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Interactive Designs, Inc. v. Kepler et al
as 1:2007cv01353
Plaintiff:
Interactive Designs, Inc., Interactive Designs, Inc., Interactive Designs, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Corey K. Kepler, CKK Consulting, Inc., Tanfrastructure, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
