Cases 41 - 50 of 61
Edebohls v. Town of Hardwick et al
as 5:2012cv00256
Plaintiff:
Robert Edebohls
Defendant:
Hardwick, Town of , Jon Jewett , Rob Lewis and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Ream-Schafft v. Flynn et al
as 2:2012cv00226
Plaintiff:
Zachary Ream-Schafft
Defendant:
Keith Flynn, Thomas Tremblay, Robert Hofmann and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv00198
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wolffing et al v. McLaughlin et al
as 2:2012cv00189
Plaintiff:
Bruce A. Wolffing and Mary R. Wolffing
Defendant:
Kevin M. McLaughlin , Chittenden County Sheriff's Department and Does 1-20
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wolffing et al v. McLaughlin et al
as 1:2012cv00189
Plaintiff:
Bruce A. Wolffing and Mary R. Wolffing
Defendant:
Kevin M. McLaughlin , Chittenden County Sheriff's Department and Does 1-20
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2012cv00075
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Paul Wright v. Yacovone et al
as 5:2012cv00027
Plaintiff:
Paul Wright
Defendant:
Dave Yacovone, Steve Dale, Lisa Keller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lawson v. Williams et al
as 1:2012cv00011
Plaintiff:
Errin Lawson
Defendant:
Thomas Williams, Robert McCarthy, Timothy Gould and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Doe et al v. Lamoille South Supervisory Union School District
as 5:2011cv00225
Plaintiff:
Joe E. Doe , Jack L. Doe and Mary Doe
Defendant:
Lamoille South Supervisory Union School District
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Balentine v. Tremblay et al
as 5:2011cv00196
Plaintiff:
Kristopher Balentine
Defendant:
Thomas Tremblay, Jeffrey Wallin, Max Schleuter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
