Cases 11 - 20 of 35
Sadowski v. BackChina, LLC et al
as 4:2019cv03550
Plaintiff:
Christopher Sadowski
Defendant:
DOES 1 through 10 inclusive and BackChina, LLC
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 504
Maxim v. BackChina, LLC et al
as 4:2019cv03545
Plaintiff:
Alex Maxim
Defendant:
DOES 1 through 10 inclusive and BackChina, LLC
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Horton et al v. Central Loan Administration and Reporting et al
as 4:2019cv03456
Defendant:
AMCAP Mortgage, Ltd, Central Loan Administration and Reporting, Lakeview Loan Servicing, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Delaina S Brown-Horton and Joseph M Horton
Cody B. Tillack v. Sony Rahman
as 4:2018cv04230
Defendant:
DOES 1 through 10, inclusive and Soni Rahman
Plaintiff:
Cody B. Tillack
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Wild v. Innova Supply Inc. et al
as 4:2018cv00320
Plaintiff:
Alexander Wild
Defendant:
Innova Supply Inc. and Does 1 through 10 inclusive
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Chapman v. Facilium Inc. et al
as 4:2017cv03322
Plaintiff:
Carl Chapman
Defendant:
Facilium Inc. and DOES 1 through 10, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Wild v. Wager et al
as 4:2017cv02606
Plaintiff:
Alexander Wild
Defendant:
Robert Wager and DOES 1 through 10, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Legodias v. Bank of America, N A et al
as 4:2017cv01057
Plaintiff:
Sheila May Legodias
Defendant:
Bank of America, N A, MERSCORP Holdings, Inc., Mortgage Electronic Registration Services, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Legodias v. Bank of America, N A et al
as 4:2017mc00480
Plaintiff:
Sheila May Legodias
Defendant:
Bank of America, N A, MERSCORP Holdings, Inc., Mortgage Electronic Registrations Systems, Inc. and others
Orient Watch Co., Ltd v. Time Center et al
as 4:2013cv03628
Plaintiff:
Orient Watch Co., Ltd
Defendant:
Time Center, Mehboob Khemani, Laila Khemani and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
