Cases 1 - 10 of 179
Superdry Restoration, Inc. v. Superdry Remediation and Restoration, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01990
Plaintiff:
Superdry Restoration, Inc.
Defendant:
Superdry Remediation & Restoration, Inc., Roy Karpman, DOES 1 through 5, inclusive and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1127 Trademark Infringement
Davion Louis v. TPG Funding, LLC
as 2:2024cv01941
Plaintiff:
Davion Louis
Defendant:
TPG Funding, LLC, DOES 1 through 5, inclusive and TPG Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Pamela Sullivan et al v. Walmart, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01111
Plaintiff:
Pamela Sullivan, Javal Ashley and Hilario Garcia
Defendant:
Walmart, Inc doing business as Spark and Does 1 through 5, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Labor/Mgmnt. Relations
Banga v. Lustig
as 24-140
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KAMLESH BANGA
Defendant / Appellee:
LAWRENCE R. LUSTIG, M.D. and DOES 1 THROUGH 5, Inclusive
Defendant:
THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA
Mejia, et al. v. Jaddou, et al.
as 23-4345
Plaintiff / Appellant:
VITO MEJIA and THELMA MEJIA
Defendant / Appellee:
UR M. JADDOU, Director, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, Secretary, U.S. Department of Homeland Security and MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL, Attorney General, U.S. Department of Justice
Defendant:
DOES, 1 through 5, inclusive
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv02556
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Jack I. Garvey v. David Philpott et al
as 5:2023cv02334
Plaintiff:
Jack I. Garvey
Defendant:
David Philpott and Does 1 through 5, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv02314
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv02041
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Rene A. Polanco v. Lehman Brothers et al
as 8:2023cv02075
Defendant:
Andrew Cecere, Richard S. Fuld, Jr., Lehman Brothers and others
Plaintiff:
Rene A. Polanco
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
