Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Alpha O Peptides AG et al v. Regents of the University of California On Behalf of the University of California et al
as 8:2023cv01758
Plaintiff:
ALPHA-O PEPTIDES AG, a Swiss limited company, PETER BURKHARD, PH.D., Alpha O Peptides AG and others
Defendant:
REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA ON BEHALF OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA IRVINE, a public trust, SUNOMIX THERAPEUTICS, entity form unknown, LBACHIR BENMOHAMED, PH.D and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Dillon Bruno et al v. CRSBX et al
as 2:2021cv04256
Defendant:
The Partnership and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A", CRSBX, June Life Store and others
Plaintiff:
Dillon Bruno, CALIBER8 INC., a California Corporation and Caliber8 Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 183
R.Y.L. Inc. v. Scientific Glass Art, Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv05606
Defendant:
Hisham Barakat, Jorge Omar Avila Martinez, Barakat Zahran and others
Respondent:
Barakat Zahran aka Zahran Barakat and Scientific Glass Art, Inc., a California corporation
Petitioner:
R.Y.L. Inc., a California corporation
Plaintiff:
R.Y.L. Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
B-5, Inc. et al v. Accu-Tac, LLC et al
as 5:2020cv00532
Defendant:
Accu-Tac, LLC, Luis Felipe Salazar and Does 1 through 50, inclusive
Plaintiff:
B-5, Inc, B-5, Inc., B & T Industries, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Eagle Eyes Traffic Industry USA Holding LLC v. JL Concepts Inc., et al
as 2:2019cv07328
Defendant:
JL Concepts Inc., Does 1 through 50, inclusive and JL Concepts Inc. a California corporation doing business as GT Racers
Plaintiff:
Eagle Eyes Traffic Industry USA Holding LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Chengdu Furinkazan Automobile Service Co. Ltd. v. Moti 5, Inc., et al
as 2:2019cv04627
Plaintiff:
Chengdu Furinkazan Automobile Service Co. Ltd.
Defendant:
MOTI 5, INC. and Does 1 through 50, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
