Cases 21 - 30 of 80
Tobon v. The Sherwin Williams Company et al
as 3:2022cv01925
Plaintiff:
Troy Tobon
Defendant:
The Sherwin Williams Company and DOES 1 through 50, Inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv01177
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Badr v. City of San Ramon et al
as 4:2021cv09575
Plaintiff:
Ali Badr
Defendant:
City of San Ramon, Police Chief Craig Stevens, Police Officer John Cattolico and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Reed v. Transdev Services, Inc. et al
as 4:2021cv09151
Plaintiff:
Anthony Reed
Defendant:
Transdev Services, Inc. and DOES 1 through 50, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2021cv07645
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1640 Truth in Lending
John v. United Parcel Service, Inc., an Ohio Corporation et al
as 4:2021cv05804
Plaintiff:
Sheila John
Defendant:
United Parcel Service, Inc., an Ohio Corporation and DOES 1 through 50, inclusive,
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bungie, Inc. et al v. Thorpe, et al
as 3:2021cv05677
Plaintiff:
BUNGIE, INC., Ubisoft Entertainment and Ubisoft, Inc.
Defendant:
ANDREW THORPE a/k/a KRYPTO, an individual, JONATHAN AGUEDA a/k/a OVERPOWERED, an individual, WESAM MOHAMMED a/k/a GRIZZY, an individual and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv03860
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv03726
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2021cv02727
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.