Cases 21 - 30 of 34
McGucken v. Displate Corporation et al
as 1:2019cv00042
Defendant:
Does 1 Through 10 Inclusive and Displate Corporation
Plaintiff:
Elliot McGucken
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Sadowski v. Daniel Whyte III d/b/a Gospel Light Society International et al
as 4:2019cv00015
Defendant:
Daniel Whyte, III, Does 1 through 10 inclusive and GLM Omnimedia Group LLC
Plaintiff:
Christopher Sadowski
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Sadowski v. DOES 1 through 10, inclusive et al
as 5:2018cv01146
Defendant:
All Black Media Digital Inc. and DOES 1 through 10, inclusive
Plaintiff:
Christopher Sadowski
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Stross v. Greenhouse Solutions, Inc.
as 1:2018cv00704
Plaintiff:
Alexander Stross
Defendant:
Greenhouse Solutions, Inc. and DOES 1 through 10, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Wild v. Innova Supply Inc. et al
as 4:2018cv00320
Plaintiff:
Alexander Wild
Defendant:
Innova Supply Inc. and Does 1 through 10 inclusive
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Chapman v. Facilium Inc. et al
as 4:2017cv03322
Plaintiff:
Carl Chapman
Defendant:
Facilium Inc. and DOES 1 through 10, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Wild v. Wager et al
as 4:2017cv02606
Plaintiff:
Alexander Wild
Defendant:
Robert Wager and DOES 1 through 10, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Hana Modz, LLC v. Dailey Vape Steals et al
as 4:2014cv00365
Petitioner:
Hana Modz, LLC
Defendant:
Dailey Vape Steals and DOES 1 to 10, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Orient Watch Co., Ltd v. Time Center et al
as 4:2013cv03628
Plaintiff:
Orient Watch Co., Ltd
Defendant:
Time Center, Mehboob Khemani, Laila Khemani and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051
InvenSense, Inc. v. STMicroelectronics, Inc.
as 2:2013cv00405
Plaintiff:
InvenSense, Inc.
Defendant:
STMicroelectronics, Inc. and DOES 1 through 10 inclusive
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
