Cases 41 - 50 of 76
Johnson v. Shifrin et al
as 5:2019cv00606
Plaintiff:
Mark Johnson
Defendant:
Moomba-Roomba, Inc., Oleg Shifrin, DOES 1 through 10 inclusive and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Johnson v. GLOBAL EXCHANGE USA INC et al
as 0:2019cv62933
Plaintiff:
Mark Johnson
Defendant:
GLOBAL EXCHANGE USA INC and Does 1 through 10 inclusive
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 0501
Mandala v. Tire Stickers LLC et al
as 6:2019cv01468
Defendant:
Does 1 through 10, Michelin North America Inc., Tire Stickers LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Steven Mandala
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
urbanlip.com ltd v. Dress Rehearsal Corp
as 0:2019cv61657
Defendant:
Dress Rehearsal Corp.; and Does 1 through 10 inclusive and Dress Rehearsal Corp
Plaintiff:
urbanlip.com ltd
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
Vineyard Vines, LLC v. Artzy et al
as 1:2019cv20970
Defendant:
Yaakov Artzy, Does 1 through 10, Jacob Artzy and others
Plaintiff:
Vineyard Vines, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Sadowski v. US Latino Multimedia Group LLC et al
as 1:2018cv24019
Plaintiff:
Christopher Sadowski
Defendant:
Does 1 through 10 inclusive and US Latino Multimedia Group LLC
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 0101
Miller v. Syndicatednews.net LLC et al
as 6:2018cv01485
Defendant:
Does 1 through 10, inclusive and Syndicatednews.net LLC
Plaintiff:
Robert Miller
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Bowers v. Digital Brands Inc. d/b/a www.dealcrunch.com et al
as 1:2018cv00117
Plaintiff:
Eric Bowers
Defendant:
Digital Brands Inc. d/b/a www.dealcrunch.com and Does 1 through 10 Inclusive
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
BOWERS v. DIGITAL BRANDS INC et al
as 1:2018cv00118
Plaintiff:
ERIC BOWERS
Defendant:
DIGITAL BRANDS INC and DOES 1 THROUGH 10 INCLUSIVE
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Bowers v. Digital Brands Inc. d/b/a www.dealcrunch.com et al
as 1:2018cv00116
Plaintiff:
Eric Bowers
Defendant:
Digital Brands Inc. d/b/a www.dealcrunch.com and Does 1 through 10 Inclusive
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
