Intellectual Property Cases filed in Pennsylvania
Cases 1 - 10 of 25
WAREKA v. BELLA FACCIA PMU, LLC et al
as 2:2023cv00315
Plaintiff: TAMARA WAREKA and TAMARA WILLIAMS
Defendant: BELLA FACCIA PMU, LLC, DOES and DOES 1 THROUGH 10
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
GOULET v. MADERLY LTD. et al
as 2:2021cv00726
Plaintiff: ALAN GOULET
Defendant: DOES 1 THROUGH 10 INCLUSIVE and MADERLY LTD. doing business as U.S. FILM CREW
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
ANSYS, INC. v. ACTOX CORPORATION et al
as 2:2020cv01694
Defendant: DOES 1 THROUGH 10, AL HATSET and ACTOX CORPORATION
Plaintiff: ANSYS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
ANSYS, INC. v. AIRTECH GROUP, INC. et al
as 2:2020cv00889
Defendant: AIRTECH VACUUM, INC, AIRTECH GROUP, INC., MIKE SUTTER and others
Plaintiff: ANSYS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
ANSYS, INC. v. ADVANCED ENGINEERING SERVICES et al
as 2:2020cv00488
Defendant: DOES 1 THROUGH 10, SVETLANA VASEY, AKHIL SETH and others
Plaintiff: ANSYS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
ANSYS, INC. v. SF MOTORS, INC. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2020cv00352
Defendant: JAMES TAYLOR, DOES 1 THROUGH 10, SF MOTORS, INC. and others
Plaintiff: ANSYS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
URBAN ONE, INC. v. WILLIAMS et al
as 2:2017cv03001
Plaintiff: URBAN ONE, INC.
Defendant: MICHAEL WILLIAMS and DOES 1 THROUGH 10
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
TANKSLEY v. DANIELS et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2016cv00081
Plaintiff: CLAYTON PRINCE TANKSLEY
Defendant: LEE DANIELS, LEE DANIELS ENTERTAINMENT, DANNY STRONG and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv07601
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051
ONLINE STORES, INC. v. UEP, INC. et al
as 2:2013cv01340
Plaintiff: ONLINE STORES, INC.
Defendant: UEP, INC. and JOHN DOES 1 THROUGH 10
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?