Cases 11 - 20 of 40
Overstock.com, Inc. v. Visocky et al
as 1:2017cv01331
Plaintiff:
Overstock.com, Inc.
Defendant:
Viktor Visocky, Otto Srams, www.hilltopstock.com and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Canada Goose Inc. v. Registrant of Canadian Goose.Com et al
as 1:2017cv00903
Plaintiff:
Canada Goose Inc.
Defendant:
Registrant of Canadian Goose.Com and John Does (1-10)
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
LHF Productions, Inc. v. Does 1-10
as 3:2016cv00748
Plaintiff:
LHF Productions, Inc.
Defendant:
Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Hypnos Limited v. Hypnos Hoodie et al
as 1:2016cv00084
Plaintiff:
Hypnos Limited
Defendant:
Hypnos Hoodie, Josh Woodle, Ryne Woodle and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Chanel, Inc. v. Green et al
as 3:2015cv00503
Plaintiff:
Chanel, Inc.
Defendant:
Tashawnda Green and Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Patient First Corporation v. HF Acquisition Co., LLC, et al
as 3:2014cv00037
Plaintiff:
Patient First Corporation
Defendant:
HF Acquisition Co., LLC, and John Does #1-10
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Chanel, Inc. v. Britt et al
as 2:2013cv00356
Plaintiff:
Chanel, Inc.
Defendant:
Christian Britt and Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Nemo Studios, GmbH et al v. Busch Gardens Williamsburg et al
as 4:2013cv00046
Plaintiff:
Nemo Studios, GmbH , Petersongs Musikverlag KG and Frank Peterson
Defendant:
Busch Gardens Williamsburg , SeaWorld Parks & Entertainment, LLC , SEAWORLD PARKS & ENTERTAINMENT, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Wing Pow International Corp. v. Knyrim et al
as 1:2012cv00903
Plaintiff:
Wing Pow International Corp.
Defendant:
Jorg Knyrim and Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 1
Chanel, Inc. v. Lu et al
as 2:2011cv00550
Plaintiff:
Chanel, Inc.
Defendant:
Gou Yi Lu, Huang Hai, Haibing and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
