Cases 11 - 20 of 25
Smith et al v. AMH 2014-1 Borrower, LLC et al
as 1:2022cv00805
Plaintiff:
Dwight Smith, Catherine Smith and Bryant Smith
Defendant:
AMH 2014-1 Borrower, LLC, Does 1-25, inclusive, American Homes 4 Rent SFR, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Diron Lai v. Stacy Travenia et al
as 2:2020cv02142
Defendant:
Stacy Travenia and Does 1-25, inclusive
Plaintiff:
Diron Lai
Diron Lai v. Stacy Travenia et al
as 2:2020cv02144
Defendant:
LaTonya McCormick, Stacy Travenia and Does 1-25, inclusive
Plaintiff:
Diron Lai and Diron Lai an individual doing business as Diron Lai Property Management
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Diron Lai v. Banuelos et al
as 2:2020cv01750
Defendant:
Does 1-25, inclusive, Eddie Banuelos, Michelle Reynaga and others
Plaintiff:
Diron Lai and Diron Lai an individual doing business as Diron Lai Property Management
U.S. REIF MG Madison Park CA. LLC v. Tommy Gold et al
as 8:2020cv00157
Defendant:
Sherry John, Does 1-25 inclusive and Tommy Gold
Plaintiff:
U.S. REIF MG Madison Park CA. LLC
PRC Multi-Family, LLC v. Keith Amos et al
as 2:2019cv09544
Plaintiff:
PRC Multi-Family, LLC
Defendant:
Does 1-25 Inclusive and Keith Amos
PRC Multi-Family, LLC v. Glennis Payne et al
as 2:2019cv07424
Plaintiff:
PRC Multi-Family, LLC
Defendant:
Does 1-25 Inclusive and Glennis Payne
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Andy Kuljis v. Estate of Pat Douhit et al
as 2:2019cv00680
Defendant:
Does 1-25 Inclusive, Dave Matos, Estate of Pat Douhit and others
Plaintiff:
Andy Kuljis
RH Park Alta Loma Owner, LLC v. THS Leasing Corp. et al
as 5:2019cv00080
Defendant:
Does 1-25 inclusive, Cecilia McGill, Lisa Lopez and others
Plaintiff:
RH Park Alta Loma Owner, LLC
Canyon Housing Partners, LLC v. Ebonee Small et al
as 5:2019cv00029
Defendant:
Does 1-25 inclusive, Mary Johnson and Ebonee Small
Plaintiff:
Canyon Housing Partners, LLC
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
