Cases 21 - 30 of 152
Ommen Brown v. Roger Walker, Jr., et al
as 10-1161
Plaintiff - Appellant:
OMMEN BROWN
Defendant - Appellee:
ROGER E. WALKER, JR., DONALD A. HULICK, Warden, GARY CONDOR and others
Ommen Brown v. Roger Walker, Jr., et al
as 09-4136
Plaintiff - Appellant:
OMMEN BROWN
Defendant - Appellee:
ROGER E. WALKER, JR., DONALD A. HULICK, Warden, GARY CONDOR and others
Howard v. Hulick et al
as 3:2009cv01026
Petitioner:
Christopher J Howard
Respondent:
Donald A. Hulick and Attorney General of the State of Illinois
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ommen Brown v. Roger Walker, Jr., et al
as 09-3810
Plaintiff - Appellant:
OMMEN BROWN
Defendant - Appellee:
ROGER E. WALKER, JR., DONALD A. HULICK, Warden, GARY CONDOR and others
Collins-Bey v. Hulick et al
as 3:2009cv00921
Petitioner:
Gregory Collins-Bey
Respondent:
Donald A. Hulick, William P. Spiller, I, Jerry W. Goforth and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Collins-Bey v. Hulick et al
as 1:2009cv06792
Plaintiff:
Gregory Collins-Bey
Defendant:
Donald A. Hulick, William P. Spiller, I, Jerry W. Goforth and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ommen Brown v. Roger Walker, Jr., et al
as 09-3534
Plaintiff - Appellant:
OMMEN BROWN
Defendant - Appellee:
ROGER E. WALKER, JR., DONALD A. HULICK, Warden, GARY CONDOR and others
Thomas v. Feinerman et al
as 3:2009cv00651
Plaintiff:
Michael Thomas
Defendant:
Adrian Feinerman, Mary Hohning and Donald A. Hulick
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hendricks v. Walker et al
as 3:2009cv00618
Plaintiff:
Richard Hendricks
Defendant:
Roger E Walker and Donald A. Hulick
Cause Of Action: M
Michael McGowan v. John Gardner, et al
as 09-2991
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL MCGOWAN
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN GARDNER, Contractor/Doctor, DOCTOR CHAPMAN, Dental Director, DONALD A. HULICK, Warden, Chief Administrative Officer and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
