Cases 31 - 40 of 152
Michael Fields v. Craig Mitchell, et al
as 09-2930
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL FIELDS
Defendant - Appellee:
CRAIG S. MITCHELL, Lieutenant, in his individual capacity, K. FLEMINGS, BETSY SPILLER, in her individual capacity and others
Paul Smith v. Donald Hulick, et al
as 09-2929
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PAUL A. SMITH
Defendant - Appellee:
DONALD A. HULICK, Warden, CHARLES PARNELL, DAVID JOHNSON and others
Paul Smith v. Donald Hulick, et al
as 09-2657
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PAUL A. SMITH
Defendant - Appellee:
DONALD A. HULICK, Warden, CHARLES PARNELL, DAVID JOHNSON and others
Courtney Hubbard v. Donald Hulick, et al
as 09-2597
Plaintiff - Appellant:
COURTNEY M. HUBBARD
Defendant - Appellee:
DONALD A. HULICK, Warden, LINDA GOFORTH, CHARLES PARNELL, Lt, Correctional Officer and others
Michael Mejia v. Roger Walker, Jr., et al
as 09-2441
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL MEJIA
Defendant - Appellee:
ROGER E. WALKER, JR., DEIRDRE BATTAGLIA, DONALD A. HULICK, Warden and others
Johnson v. Delgado et al
as 3:2009cv00420
Plaintiff:
Terry C Johnson
Defendant:
Jose A Delgado, Robert Newell, Tracy Lee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
James Collins v. Donald Gaetz
as 09-2212
Petitioner - Appellant:
JAMES COLLINS
Respondent - Appellee:
DONALD A. HULICK, Warden and DONALD GAETZ
Sammy Moore v. Donald Gaetz
as 09-1997
Petitioner - Appellant:
SAMMY J. MOORE
Respondent - Appellee:
DONALD A. HULICK, Warden and DONALD GAETZ
Jesse Smith v. Donald Gaetz
as 07-2713
Petitioner - Appellant:
JESSE SMITH
Respondent - Appellee:
TERRY MCCANN, DONALD A. HULICK, Warden and DONALD GAETZ
Maurice McDonald v. D. Porter, et al
as 09-1781
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MAURICE J. MCDONALD
Defendant - Appellee:
D. PORTER, Correctional Officer, Internal Affairs, UNKNOWN PARTY, Phychiatrist Melissa, RAMOS, Associate Warden and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
