Cases 1 - 6 of 6
GEE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv30697
Plaintiff:
DONALD GEE
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Gee v. Wyoming Department of Corrections Director et al
as 2:2012cv00161
Plaintiff:
Donald Gee
Defendant:
Lampert, Wyoming Department of Corrections Director, Wyoming Department of Corrections State Penitentiary Warden, Wyoming Department of Corrections State Penitentiary Unit Manager and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gee v. Pacheco, et al
as 12-8005
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DONALD GEE
Defendant - Appellee:
MIKE PACHECO, in his official capacity as Wyoming Department of Corrections State Penitentiary Unit Manager, VANCE EVERETT, in his official capacity as (former) Warden, Wyoming Department of Corrections State Penitentiary, CARL VOIGTSBERGER, in his official capacity as Wyoming Department of Corrections State Penitentiary Classification and Housing Manager and others
Gee v. Wyoming Department of Correcti
as 08-8088
Petitioner - Appellant:
DONALD GEE
Respondent - Appellee:
MICHAEL J MURPHY, Warden, Wyoming Department of Corrections State Penitentiary
Gee v. Wyoming Department of Corrections State Penitentiary Warden
as 2:2008cv00193
Petitioner:
Donald Gee
Respondent:
Wyoming Department of Corrections State Penitentiary Warden
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Gee v. Wyoming Department of Correcti, et al
as 08-8057
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DONALD GEE
Defendant - Appellee:
MIKE PACHECO, in his official capacity as Wyoming Department of Corrections State Penitentiary Unit Manager, VANCE EVERETT, in his official capacity as (former) Warden, Wyoming Department of Corrections State Penitentiary, CARL VOIGTSBERGER, in his official capacity as Wyoming Department of Corrections State Penitentiary Classification and Housing Manager and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
