Cases 1 - 10 of 26
WILLIAMS v. TRUMP et al
as 1:2022cv03625
Plaintiff:
STANLEY LORENZO WILLIAMS
Defendant:
DONALD JOHN TRUMP and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF LATTER-DAY SAINTS et al v. TRUMP
as 1:2020cv03331
Plaintiff:
XIU JIAN SUN and CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF LATTER-DAY SAINTS
Defendant:
DONALD JOHN TRUMP and DONALD J. TRUMP
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 8715
HOLT v. COLORADO RIVER INDIAN TRIBES et al
as 1:2020cv01042
Defendant:
COLORADO RIVER INDIAN TRIBES, PASQUALE ANTHONY CIPOLLONE, GILA RIVER INDIAN COMMUNITY and others
Plaintiff:
JOE KENNETH HOLT, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PENK v. TRUMP
as 1:2019cv03857
Plaintiff:
PAGE DAVID PENK
Defendant:
DONALD JOHN TRUMP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
PENK v. TRUMP
as 1:2019cv03745
Plaintiff:
PAGE DAVID PENK
Defendant:
DONALD JOHN TRUMP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv02901
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv02851
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv02274
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
PERALES v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2019cv00634
Defendant:
ANNETTE TOTTEN, TREY TREADWELL, U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES and others
Plaintiff:
AZAEL D. PERALES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
NATIONAL AIR TRAFFIC CONTROLLERS ASSOCIATION, AFL-CIO et al v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2019cv00062
Plaintiff:
NATIONAL AIR TRAFFIC CONTROLLERS ASSOCIATION, AFL-CIO, JOHN GARNER, KEVIN BIANCHI and others
Defendant:
MICK MULVANEY, DAVID BERNHARDT, DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR and others
Petitioner:
TRACY JENSON
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
