Cases filed in Oklahoma
Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Cray v. Hamilton
as 6:2023cv00074
Petitioner: Donald Lee Cray
Respondent: Casey Hamilton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Peacock v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
as 5:2018cv00393
Plaintiff: Donald Lee Peacock
Defendant: State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Type: Contract Insurance
Warren v United States of America
as 4:2013cv00768
Defendant: Donald Lee Warren and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ellison v. Parker We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 6:2011cv00293
Petitioner: Donald Lee Ellison, Jr.
Respondent: David Parker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Duncan v. State of Oklahoma We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 6:2011cv00212
Petitioner: Donald Lee Duncan
Defendant: State of Oklahoma
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
State Farm Fire & Casualty Company v. Medford et al
as 5:2009cv01000
Plaintiff: State Farm Fire & Casualty Company
Defendant: Andrew Medford and Donald Lee Watkins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Type: Contract None
Duncan v. Mullins
as 6:2009cv00188
Petitioner: Donald Lee Duncan
Respondent: Mike Mullins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Duncan v. Mullins We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 6:2009cv00188
Petitioner: Donald Lee Duncan
Respondent: Mike Mullins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Duncan v. Mullins
as 4:2009cv00199
Petitioner: Donald Lee Duncan
Respondent: Mike Mullins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Warren v. USA
as 4:2007cv00279
Plaintiff: Donald Lee Warren
Defendant: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?