Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Evans v. City of New York et al
as 1:2015cv04352
Defendant:
City of New York, P.O. Donald Sadowy and Unidentified New York City Police Officers
Plaintiff:
Orrel Evans
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mark v. City of New York et al
as 1:2014cv06619
Defendant:
City of New York, John and Jane Does 1-3, Donald Sadowy and others
Plaintiff:
Jamal Mark
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Smith v. City of New York et al
as 1:2014cv02935
Defendant:
City of New York, John/Jane Does #1-4, New York City Police Department and others
Plaintiff:
Ms. Shariffa Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Graves v. City of New York et al
as 1:2014cv01603
Defendant:
City of New York and Police Officer Donald Sadowy
Plaintiff:
Dennis Graves
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jones v. City of New York et al
as 1:2013cv04233
Defendant:
City of New York, P.O. Michael Fung, Sergeant Carlos Lewis and others
Plaintiff:
Shakim Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Weber et al v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2013cv04874
Plaintiff:
Michael Weber , Jimmie Reed and Jayson Smith
Defendant:
The City of New York , Frederic Vanpelt and Donald Sadowy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Elliot v. City of New York et al
as 1:2012cv04105
Defendant:
City of New York, John Doe #1-2 and Police Officer Donald Sadowy
Plaintiff:
Darvell Elliot
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Williams et al v. City of New York et al
as 1:2012cv03947
Defendant:
City of New York, John and Jane Does 1 through 5 and Donald Sadowy
Plaintiff:
Michael Spencer and Princess Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
James v. City of New York et al
as 1:2012cv00215
Defendant:
City of New York, Thomas Daly, John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Travis James
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
