Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Martinaj v. Uhler
as 24-72
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BERNARDO MARTINAJ
Plaintiff:
JOHN AMANTE, ARISMENDI FABIAN, STEVE ARMENTO and others
Defendant / Appellee:
DONALD UHLER, Superintendent; Upstate Correctional Facility, JOSEPH BELLNIER, Deputy Commissioner, Correctional Facilities Operations, DONALD QUINN, First Deputy Superintendent; Clinton Correctional Facility and others
Defendant:
STEVEN RACETTE, Superintendent; Clinton Correctional Facility, WIDDUN, CERT Officer, CERT OFFICER NO. 3441 OR 3448 and others
Vance v. The State of New York Department of Corrections
as 22-3206
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Wayne Phillip Vance
Defendant / Appellee:
Glen Engstrom, Officer, Clinton Correctional Facility, Ambrose Waldron, Officer, Clinton Correctional Facility, Chad Rowe, Officer, Clinton Correctional Facility and others
Defendant:
The State of New York Department of Corrections and Community Supervision, Anthony J. Annucci, Commissioner of the Department of Corrections and Community Supervision, Karen Bellamy, Director, Inmate Grievance Program for DOCCS and others
Vance v. The State of New York Department of Corrections
as 22-3095
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Wayne Phillip Vance
Defendant:
The State of New York Department of Corrections and Community Supervision, Anthony J. Annucci, Commissioner of the Department of Corrections and Community Supervision, Karen Bellamy, Director, Inmate Grievance Program for DOCCS and others
Defendant / Appellee:
A. Rodriguez, Director, Special Housing and Disciplinary Program, DOCCS, Mr. Weishaupt, Special Investigator, DOCCS, Glen Engstrom, Officer, Clinton Correctional Facility and others
Bradshaw v. Uhler
as 22-411
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Jay Bradshaw
Defendant / Appellee:
C.O. Phillip, Upstate Correctional Facility, Malette, Correctional Officer; Upstate Correctional Facility, Hanna, Correctional Officer; Upstate Correctional Facility and others
Defendant:
Donald Uhler, Superintendent; Upstate Correctional Facility, Woody, Deputy; Upstate Correctional Facility, Marshall, Correctional Sergeant; Upstate Correctional Facility and others
White v. Marinelli
as 19-906
Defendant / Appellee:
Roxanne LeClerc, Offender Rehabilitation Counselor; Upstate Correctional Facility, Tracy Nelson, Supervisor Offender Rehabilitation Counselor/F.O.I.L. Officer, George Waterson, Nurse; Upstate Correctional Facility and others
Defendant:
Richard Winston, Correctional Officer; Upstate Correctional Facility, Michael J. Bashaw, Jr., Correctional Officer, Richard Scott, Sergeant; Upstate Correctional Facility and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Equarn White
Reeder v. Annucci
as 18-1145
Defendant:
Borrough, Correction Officer; Upstate Correctional Facility, Tier Hearing Officer Zerniak, P. Drumm, Video Officer and others
Appellee:
Locke, Correction Officer; Upstate Correctional Facility, Donald Uhler, Superintendent, Captain Bishop, Upstate Correctional Facility and others
Appellant:
Raszell Reeder
White v. Uhler
as 17-2611
Plaintiff - Appellant:
John H. White, AKA John White
Defendant - Appellee:
E. Bell, Deputy of Security, Donita E. McIntosh, Deputy of Programs, N. Lipka, Officer and others
Defendant:
Donald Uhler, Superintendent, Reginald Bishop, Captain, T. Zerniak, Captain and others
Reeder v. Annucci
as 17-2524
Appellee:
Faruki, Great Meadow Correctional Facility, Sergeant Rodles, Upstate Correctional Facility, Kumar, Doctor; Upstate Correctional Facility and others
Defendant:
C.O. Ramsdell, Correction Officer; Upstate Correctional Facility, Deposio, Wende Correctional Facility, Anthony J. Annucci, Commissioner; Department of Corrections and others
Plaintiff:
Raszell Reeder
Rodriguez v. Graham
as 17-588
Petitioner - Appellant:
Nilton Rodriguez
Respondent:
Superintendent Harold D. Graham, Auburn Correctional Facility
Respondent - Appellee:
Donald Uhler, Superintendent, Upstate Correctional Facility
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
