Cases 1 - 7 of 7
SMITH v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2024cv00914
Plaintiff:
DONNA SMITH
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON, JOHNSON & JOHNSON HOLDCO (NA), INC., LTL MANAGEMENT, LLC and others
Not Yet Classified:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
SMITH v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2023cv15046
Plaintiff:
DONNA SMITH
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON, JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC., LTL MANAGEMENT, LLC. and others
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES, AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
SMITH v. ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS LP et al
as 2:2020cv15297
Plaintiff:
DONNA SMITH
Defendant:
ASTRAZENECA LP, ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS LP and MERCK & CO. INC. D/B/A MERCK, SHARP & DOHME CORPORATION
In Re:
PROTON-PUMP INHIBITOR PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION (No. II)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CULLUM v. SMITH et al
as 3:2019cv14091
Defendant:
CURTIS MORLAND, DONNA SMITH and MONMOUTH COUNTY DENTAL
Plaintiff:
JENNIE CULLUM
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SMITH v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2018cv08205
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON , JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC. and IMERYS TALC AMERICA, INC ("IMERYS TALC")
Plaintiff:
DONNA SMITH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SMITH et al v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2017cv10769
Plaintiff:
DONNA SMITH and JAMES SMITH
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON , JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC , IMERYS TALC AMERICA, INC ("IMERYS TALC") and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SMITH et al v. L-3 COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION et al
as 1:2010cv02050
Plaintiff:
DONNA SMITH and MALCOLM WRIGHT
Defendant:
L-3 COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION , JOHN DOE CORPORATIONS (1-10) and JOHN DOES (11-20)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
