Cases 1 - 10 of 29
Omnity Consulting, LLC v. Doordash, Inc.
as 4:2024cv00959
Plaintiff:
Omnity Consulting, LLC dba Harlem Shake (West 124th Street) and Omnity Consulting, LLC individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated doing business as Harlem Shake (West 124th Street)
Defendant:
Doordash, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 16 U.S.C. § 1361
Karout v. Doordash, Inc.
as 3:2023cv06148
Plaintiff:
Sharbell Karout
Defendant:
Doordash, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv02805
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Lendenbaum v. Doordash, Inc.
as 3:2023cv00370
Plaintiff:
Phillip Lendenbaum
Defendant:
Doordash, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Lawson v. Doordash, Inc.
as 3:2022cv04059
Plaintiff:
LEONARD LAWSON
Defendant:
Doordash, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Schwartz et al v. Doordash, Inc.
as 4:2022cv00250
Plaintiff:
Rebecca Schwartz, Zachary Chin, Joseph Flinders and others
Defendant:
Doordash, Inc. and DOES 1-50
Interested Party:
Leonard Lawson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Antosi v. DoorDash, Inc.
as 3:2021cv08096
Plaintiff:
IDEDA ANTOSI
Defendant:
Doordash, Inc.,
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Doordash, Inc. et al v. City and County of San Francisco
as 3:2021cv05502
Plaintiff:
Doordash, Inc. and GrubHub Inc.
Defendant:
San Francisco City and County and City and County of San Francisco
Amicus Curiae:
Chamber of Commerce of the United State of America and California Chamber of Commerce
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statutes
Thayer v. Uber, Inc. - Uber Eat's et al
as 4:2021cv03936
Defendant:
Doordash, Inc.,, IHeart Radio, Answear United and others
Plaintiff:
Zachary Thayer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Dow v. Doordash, Inc.
as 3:2021cv01122
Plaintiff:
Terry Dow
Defendant:
Doordash, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
