Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Dorfman et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 4:2024cv10942
Plaintiff:
Neil Dorfman, Travis Corby, Chad Hobson and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Motor Vehicle Product Liability
Dorfman et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 2:2023cv12312
Plaintiff:
Neil Dorfman, Travis Corby, Chad Hobson and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Ryan Henry, et al v. Quicken Loans, Inc.
as 11-2125
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RYAN C. HENRY, KEVIN ANSARI, JEFFREY BADE and others
Defendant - Appellee:
QUICKEN LOANS, INCORPORATED
Ryan Henry, et al v. Quicken Loans, Inc.
as 11-2125
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RYAN C. HENRY, KEVIN ANSARI, JEFFREY BADE and others
Defendant / Appellee:
QUICKEN LOANS INCORPORATED
Associated Chiropractic Clinic and Medical Centers, P.C. et al v. Hartford Casualty Insurance Company
as 2:2010cv11145
Plaintiff:
Associated Chiropractic Clinic & Medical Centers, P.C. , Richard Lutz , Karen Lutz and others
Defendant:
Hartford Casualty Insurance Company
Amantea et al v. Innotrac, Inc. et al
as 1:2007cv03542
Plaintiff:
Nancy J. Amantea, Carmen P. Arrigo, Jeffrey H. Berry and others
Defendant:
Innotrac, Inc., Scott Dorfman, David L. Gansey and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15 Antitrust Litigation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2007cv13476
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Henry v. Quicken Loans, Incorporated et al
as 2:2004cv40346
Defendant:
Quicken Loans, Incorporated, Rock Financial Corporation, Daniel B. Gilbert and others
Plaintiff:
Ryan C. Henry, Kevin Ansari, Jeffrey Bade and others
Interested Party:
Mortgage Bankers Association, American Bankers Association, American Financial Services Association and others
Amicus Curiae:
US Dept of Labor
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
