Cases 11 - 20 of 44
Mason v. Gillespie et al
as 2:2013cv01990
Defendant:
Clark County Detention Center and Doug Gillespie
Plaintiff:
Richard Mason
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Colcord v. Clark County et al
as 2:2013cv01720
Defendant:
Clark County, Doug Gillespie and Naphcare
Plaintiff:
Case S. Colcord
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jerry Pough v. Doug Gillespie, et al
as 13-16392
Petitioner - Appellant:
JERRY D. POUGH
Respondent - Appellee:
DOUG GILLESPIE and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
Pough v. Gillespie et al
as 2:2013cv00644
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of Nevada and Doug Gillespie
Petitioner:
Jerry D. Pough
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Myers v. Gillespie et al
as 2:2013cv00601
Defendant:
Administrative Body, Doug Gillespie, Medical Provider NaphCare and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Myers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Putzer v. Attal., et al.,
as 2:2013cv00165
Defendant:
Shmuel Attal, Susan Brager, Larry Brown and others
Plaintiff:
David Saul Putzer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Antonetti v. Las Vegas, Nevada, Co. Clark et al
as 2:2013cv00064
Defendant:
8th Judicial District Court, L.C. Adams, Isidro Baca and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph Antonetti
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
O'Keefe v. Gillespie et al
as 2:2012cv01388
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of Nevada and Doug Gillespie
Petitioner:
Brian Kerry O'Keefe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mescall v. University Medical Center et al
as 2:2012cv00927
Defendant:
Esq. Danae Adams, Franklin Akioyame, Ralph Aquino and others
Plaintiff:
Randall Mescall
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Anthony Posey v. Doug Gillespie, et al
as 12-15828
Petitioner - Appellant:
ANTHONY M. POSEY
Respondent - Appellee:
DOUG GILLESPIE, Sheriff and CATHERINE CORTEZ MASTO
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
