Cases 21 - 30 of 44
McKinney v. Aranas et al
as 2:2012cv00401
Defendant:
Linda C. Adams, Gilbert Aguilar, Dr. Aranas and others
Plaintiff:
William McKinney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Posey v. Gillespie et al
as 2:2012cv00313
Respondent:
Catherine Cortez Masto and Sheriff Doug Gillespie
Petitioner:
Anthony M. Posey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Brian O'Keefe v. Doug Gillespie, et al
as 12-15271
Petitioner - Appellant:
BRIAN KERRY O'KEEFE
Respondent - Appellee:
DOUG GILLESPIE, Sheriff, STATE OF NEVADA and ATTORNEY GENERAL
O'Keefe v. Gillespie et al
as 2:2011cv02109
Respondent:
Attorney General, Doug Gillespie and State Of Nevada
Petitioner:
Brian Kerry O'Keefe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Kerber v. Gillespie et al
as 2:2011cv01952
Defendant:
City Of Las Vegas, Clark County Commissioners, County of Clark, NV and others
Plaintiff:
Martin Kerber
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kerber v. Gillespie et al
as 2:2011cv01794
Defendant:
Board of Commissioners of Clark County, City Of Las Vegas, County of Clark, NV and others
Plaintiff:
Martin Kerber
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sapien v. Gillespie et al
as 2:2011cv01347
Defendant:
Jim Dixon, Captian Donahue, Doug Gillespie and others
Plaintiff:
Ruben Sapien
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dean v. Gillespie
as 2:2011cv01226
Plaintiff:
Charles Dean
Defendant:
Doug Gillespie
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sapien v. Gillespie et al
as 2:2011cv01200
Defendant:
Jim Dixon, Captian Donahue, Doug Gillespie and others
Plaintiff:
Ruben Sapien
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shawn Glover v. Doug Gillespie
as 11-16593
Petitioner - Appellant:
SHAWN LYNN GLOVER
Respondent - Appellee:
DOUG GILLESPIE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
