Cases 41 - 50 of 66
Carlos Williams v. Doug Waddington, et al
as 08-35530
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CARLOS JOHN WILLIAMS
Defendant:
WASHINGTON STATE and CORRECTIONS OFFICER ANDERSON
Defendant - Appellee:
DOUG WADDINGTON, Superintendent, OFFICER HANSMEYER, Corrections Officer and SARGENT SANCHEZ, 1st Shift Sargent
Davis v. Gay et al
as 3:2008cv05333
Petitioner:
Karl J Davis
Respondent:
John Gay, Doug Waddington and Rob McKenna
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Stratton v. Waddington
as 3:2008cv05256
Plaintiff:
Donald Lyle Stratton
Defendant:
Doug Waddington
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Thomas v. Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2008cv05234
Plaintiff:
Cory Lamont Thomas
Defendant:
Department of Corrections, Washington Corrections Center, Cedar Creek Corrections Center and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Keith Nash v. Doug Waddington, et al
as 08-35281
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KEITH L. NASH
Defendant - Appellee:
DOUG WADDINGTON, KEVIN SHANAHAN, JOHN SCOTT and others
Dunuan v. Waddington
as 2:2008cv00147
Petitioner:
Ralph Dunuan
Respondent:
Doug Waddington
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Tabb v. Waddington et al
as 3:2008cv05015
Plaintiff:
Danny Tabb
Defendant:
Doug Waddington, Douglas Carr, Harold Clarke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lee v. Waddington et al
as 3:2007cv05714
Plaintiff:
Ezekiel D. Lee
Defendant:
Doug Waddington, Serena Davis, Toby Dunnington and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Masse v. Waddington et al
as 3:2007cv05715
Plaintiff:
Toby J. Masse
Defendant:
Doug Waddington, Jacobs, John #1 Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sutton v. Waddington
as 2:2007cv01462
Petitioner:
Brandon Sutton
Respondent:
Doug Waddington
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
