Cases 1 - 10 of 394
Stomberg-Tompkins v. State of Oregon
as 3:2025cv00337
Petitioner:
Troy Douglas Stomberg-Tompkins
Respondent:
State of Oregon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Stomberg-Tompkins v. State or Oregon
as 3:2025cv00338
Petitioner:
Troy Douglas Stomberg-Tompkins
Respondent:
State or Oregon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Stomberg-Tompkins v. State of Oregon
as 3:2025cv00339
Petitioner:
Troy: Douglas Stomberg-Tompkins
Respondent:
State of Oregon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Stomberg-Tompkins v. State of Oregon
as 3:2025cv00340
Petitioner:
Troy: Douglas Stomberg-Tompkins
Respondent:
State of Oregon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Stomberg-Tompkins v. State of Oregon
as 3:2025cv00278
Petitioner:
Troy Douglas Stomberg-Tompkins
Respondent:
State of Oregon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Foust et al v. Roseland
as 6:2024cv02137
Plaintiff:
Douglas Lee Foust, Austin Lee Foust and Lauren Mercede Krause / Foust
Defendant:
Janna Kirstin Roseland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Servos v. Santiam Correctional Institution
as 6:2024cv02144
Defendant:
Santiam Correctional Institution
Plaintiff:
Douglas Leon Servos
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Servos v. Strauss
as 6:2024cv02143
Defendant:
Dr. Strauss
Plaintiff:
Douglas Leon Servos
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Houston v. Deveraeuk et al
as 3:2024cv02077
Defendant:
Bryce Brown, Matthew Adams, Damon Deveraeuk and others
Plaintiff:
John Douglas Houston
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Vasquez v. Marion County Jail et al
as 6:2024cv01920
Defendant:
MCJ Health Services, Guttierez, Larson and others
Plaintiff:
Kirk Alexander Vasquez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
