Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Douglas Schottenstein, et al v. Edward Capla, et al
as 24-10588
Intervenor:
DOUGLAS SCHOTTENSTEIN and SCHOTTENSTEIN PAIN AND NEURO, PLLC D/B/A NY SPINE
Defendant:
EDWARD CAPLA and YOLANDA CAPLA
Orthogen International GmbH v. Edward Capla, et al
as 24-10411
Plaintiff:
ORTHOGEN INTERNATIONAL GMBH, for an order pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1782 to conduct discovery for use in a foreign proceeding
Defendant:
EDWARD CAPLA and YOLANDA CAPLA
Not Yet Classified:
SERVICE
Intervenor:
DOUGLAS SCHOTTENSTEIN and SCHOTTENSTEIN PAIN AND NEURO, PLLC D/B/A NY SPINE
Schottenstein et al v. Capla et al
as 1:2022cv10883
Plaintiff:
MD DOUGLAS SCHOTTENSTEIN, Schottenstein Pain and Neuro, PLLC d/b/a NY Spine Medicine, Douglas Schottenstein and others
Defendant:
Orthogen, FDA Food and Drug Administration, MD Robert M. Califf and others
Nominal Defendant:
United States Food and Drug Administration and M.D. Robert M. Califf
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Schottenstein, M.D. et al v. Lee et al
as 1:2022cv01197
Plaintiff:
Dr. Douglas Schottenstein, M.D., Thompson Real Estate, LLC, Schottenstein Pain and Neuro, PLLC d/b/a NY Spine Medicine and others
Defendant:
Derek Lee, Pearl Chan, Kong H Chan and others
Counter Defendant:
Schottenstein Pain and Neuro, PLLC
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Schottenstein et al v. Citibank, N.A.
as 1:2021cv01806
Plaintiff:
Thompson Real Estate, LLC and Dr. Douglas Schottenstein
Defendant:
Citibank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Schottenstein v. American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals (ASPCA) et al
as 1:2020cv09961
Defendant:
Blue Pearl Operations LLC, American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals (ASPCA), CITY OF NEW YORK and others
Plaintiff:
Dr. Douglas Schottenstein
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 cv Fed. Question: Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
