Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Gossett v. Moore et al
as 1:2023cv01168
Plaintiff:
Brian Gossett
Defendant:
Douglas T. Moore, Robert D. Barry, Albert Fouerti and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 635 Breach of Insurance Contract
GOSSETT v. BARRY et al
as 1:2023cv01166
Plaintiff:
BRIAN GOSSETT
Defendant:
ROBERT D. BARRY, DOUGLAS T. MOORE, ALBERT FOUERTI and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
Wong v. Moore et al
as 1:2023cv00559
Plaintiff:
Mei Ling Wong
Defendant:
Douglas T. Moore, Robert Barry, Albert Fouerti and others
Maschhoff v. Polished.com Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv06606
Plaintiff:
Ryan Maschhoff
Defendant:
Polished.com Inc., Douglas T. Moore, Robert D. Barry and others
Petitioner:
Anthony Porraro, Eden Alpha CI LP and Ari Gold
Starr Indemnity & Liability Company et al v. Lumber Liquidators Holdings, Inc. et al
as 4:2016cv00114
Plaintiff:
Starr Indemnity & Liability Company , Travelers Casualty and Surety Company of America , Liberty Insurance Underwriters Inc. and others
Defendant:
Lumber Liquidators Holdings, Inc., Macon F. Brock, Douglas T. Moore and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
AMALGAMATED BANK, as Trustee for the LONGVIEW 600 SMALL CAP INDEX FUND, Derivatively on Behalf of LUMBER LIQUIDATORS HOLDINGS, INC. v. Brock et al
as 4:2015cv00030
Plaintiff:
AMALGAMATED BANK, as Trustee for the LONGVIEW 600 SMALL CAP INDEX FUND, Derivatively on Behalf of LUMBER LIQUIDATORS HOLDINGS, INC.
Defendant:
Macon F. Brock, Jr. , Robert M. Lynch , Douglas T. Moore and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Doan v. Brock et al
as 4:2015cv00025
Plaintiff:
Phuc Doan
Defendant:
Macon F. Brock, Jr., Carl R. Daniels, Jr., Robert M. Lynch and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Klein v. Brock et al
as 4:2015cv00016
Plaintiff:
R. Andre Klein
Defendant:
Macon F. Brock, Jr., Carl R. Daniels, Jr., Robert M. Lynch and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
