Cases 41 - 50 of 115
California Department of Toxic Substances Control et al v. American Honda Motor Co., Inc. et al
as 2:2010cv03378
Defendant:
American Honda Motor Co., Inc., Anadarko E&P Company LP, Atlantic Richfield Company and others
Plaintiff:
California Department of Toxic Substances Control and The California Toxic Substances Control Account
YTY Industry SDN BHD v. The Dow Chemical Company
as 10-55284
Plaintiff - Appellee:
YTY INDUSTRY SDN BHD, a Malaysian corporation
Defendant - Appellant:
THE DOW CHEMICAL COMPANY, a Delaware corporation
Kotrous v. Goss-Jewett Co North, et al
as 2:2002cv01520
Plaintiff:
James Kotrous
Defendant:
Goss-Jewett Company of Northern California Inc , Estate of Robert Lamanet, Steven Lamanet and others
Counter_defendant:
James Kotrous , Rosalie A. Anselmo , Karen L. Lilienthal and others
Cross_defendant:
Albert G Volz, Estate of Robert M Carmany, Estate of Frances Carmany and others
Cross_claimant:
Goss-Jewett Company of Northern California Inc , Steven Lamanet, Michael Lamanet and others
Counter_claimant:
Bayer CropScience Incorporated , Kleinfelder, Inc. , Rosalie A. Anselmo and others
Thirdparty_plaintiff:
Rosalie A. Anselmo and Karen L. Lilienthal
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 9607 Real Property Tort to Land
Teleconference Systems LLC v. Hewlett-Packard Company et al
as 3:2009cv05896
Plaintiff:
Teleconference Systems LLC
Defendant:
Hewlett-Packard Company , AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP , Dow Chemical Company and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Tulare District Healthcare System v. The Dow Chemical Company et al
as 1:2009at00987
Plaintiff:
Tulare District Healthcare System
Defendant:
The Dow Chemical Company and DOW ROOFING SYSTEMS, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Tulare District Healthcare System v. The Dow Chemical Company et al
as 1:2009cv02206
Plaintiff:
Tulare District Healthcare System and Tulare District Healthcare System
Defendant:
The Dow Chemical Company, The Dow Chemical Company, The Dow Chemical Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
YTY Industry SDN BHD v. Dow Chemical Company
as 09-56898
Plaintiff - Appellant:
YTY INDUSTRY SDN BHD, a Malaysian corporation
Defendant - Appellee:
DOW CHEMICAL COMPANY, a Delaware corporation
Atchison Topeka, et al v. Hercules Inc, et al
as 1:1996cv05879
Plaintiff:
Atchison Topeka and Santa Fe Railway Company , Department of Toxic Substances Control and USA
Defendant:
Hercules Incorporated , Hercules Powder Company , Burlington Northern Santa Fe and others
Cross_claimant:
Hercules Powder Company , Chevron Chemical Company , Hercules Incorporated and others
Cross_defendant:
Brown and Bryant Inc, Ed A Brown, John H Brown and others
Counter_claimant:
Hercules Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Atchison Topeka, et al v. Brown & Bryant Inc, et al
as 1:1992cv05068
Plaintiff:
Atchison Topeka and Santa Fe Railway Company , Southern Pacific and USA
Defendant:
Brown and Bryant Inc , John H Brown , Ed A Brown and others
Counter_claimant:
Brown and Bryant Inc , John H Brown , Ed A Brown and others
Counter_defendant:
Atchison Topeka and Santa Fe Railway Company , Southern Pacific , Puregro Company and others
Thirdparty_plaintiff:
Ed A Brown , John H Brown , Brown and Bryant Inc and others
Thirdparty_defendant:
Shell Oil Company , Rhone-Poulenc Inc , Hercules Incorporated and others
Cross_claimant:
Puregro Company
Cross_defendant:
Brown and Bryant Inc , John H Brown , Ed A Brown and others
Claimant:
State Board of Equalization and Department of Toxic Substances Control
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 9607 Real Property Tort to Land
USA v. Abex Aerospace Div, et al
as 2:2000cv12471
Defendant:
ABM CMS, Inc., Abex Aerospace Division, Air Conditioning Co. Inc. and others
Mitutoyo American Corporation:
MTI Engineering Corporation
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1365 Environmental Matters
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
