Cases 1 - 10 of 65
Feusi v. Centurion of Idaho, LLC, et al.
as 1:2024cv00172
Plaintiff:
David Feusi
Defendant:
Centurion of Idaho, LLC, Dr. Kate Wilks, Chad Page and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wintrode v. Stoutin et al
as 1:2024cv00158
Plaintiff:
Joshwa Aaron Wintrode
Defendant:
Dr. Sherry Stoutin, Ivy Medical and Twin Falls County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Corelli v. STAXX, LLC, an Idaho limited liability company
as 2:2024cv00101
Plaintiff:
Dr. Todd Corelli
Defendant:
STAXX, LLC, an Idaho limited liability company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Wintrode v. Clive et al
as 1:2024cv00053
Plaintiff:
Joshwa Aaron Wintrode
Defendant:
Dr. Clive, Dr. Dayley, Dr. Mcghinnis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Friedli v. Richardson, et al.
as 1:2024cv00016
Plaintiff:
Ronald Joshua Friedli
Defendant:
Richardson, Eliason, Patchet and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Campbell
as 1:2024cv00004
Plaintiff:
Kent Williams
Defendant:
Dr. Walter Campbell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Campbell
as 1:2024cv00006
Plaintiff:
Kent Williams
Defendant:
Dr. Walter Campbell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Campbell, et al.
as 1:2023cv00584
Plaintiff:
Kent Williams
Defendant:
Dr. Walter Campbell, Director Atencio, Director Tewalt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Dr. Rogers et al
as 1:2023cv00481
Plaintiff:
James Edward Jones
Defendant:
Dr. Rogers and Dr. Worley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00464
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Debtor In Possession:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
