Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Williams v. Campbell
as 1:2024cv00004
Plaintiff:
Kent Williams
Defendant:
Dr. Walter Campbell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Campbell
as 1:2024cv00006
Plaintiff:
Kent Williams
Defendant:
Dr. Walter Campbell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Campbell, et al.
as 1:2023cv00584
Plaintiff:
Kent Williams
Defendant:
Dr. Walter Campbell, Director Atencio, Director Tewalt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Atencio, et al.
as 1:2023cv00111
Plaintiff:
Kent Williams
Defendant:
Dr. Walter Campbell, Director Atencio, Director Tewalt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
J. Antonio Tony Parker Moses Muina v. Cypress Urgent Care Clinic et al
as 8:2017cv00533
Defendant:
Cypress Urgent Care Clinic, Cyress Urgent Care Clinic, Jonathan Kiindarius and others
Plaintiff:
J. Antonio Tony Parker Moses Muina
J Antonio Rafer Antonio Tony Parker Moses Muina v. Cypress Urgent Care Clinic Katella Avenue Anaheim et al
as 8:2015cv00989
Defendant:
Administrator of Said Cypress Urgent Care Katella Avenue Clinic, Cypress Urgent Care Clinic Katella Avenue Anaheim, Cypress Urgent Care Clinic Medical Provider in Anaheim California and others
Plaintiff:
J Antonio Rafer Antonio Tony Parker Moses Muina
Daniel Ray Darnell v. Fresenius Medical Care Holdings, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv05052
Plaintiff:
Daniel Ray Darnell
Defendant:
Does, Fresenius Medical Care Holdings, Inc., Fresenius Medical Care North America Inc and others
Joseph Thiede v. Fresenius Medical Care Holdings, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv04741
Defendant:
Does, Fresenius Medical Care Holdings, Inc., Fresenius Medical Care North America, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph Thiede
Jane MK Doe v. Starbucks Inc et al
as 8:2008cv00582
Plaintiff:
Jane MK Doe
Defendant:
Does, Timothy Horton and Starbucks Inc
Interested Party:
Dr. Walter Moore
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
