Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Dawes v. The People of the State of California et al
as 3:2024cv00401
Plaintiff:
William Orren Dawes
Defendant:
The People of the State of California, Rob Bonta, Gavin Newsom and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Felix v. Clayton et al
as 3:2022cv00559
Plaintiff:
Donald Felix
Defendant:
Medical Dr. David Clayton, S. Gates, Dr. S. Roberts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Sergio Delgado v. High Desert State Prison
as 2:2022cv00552
Plaintiff:
Sergio Delgado
Defendant:
High Desert State Prison, Officer Ramos and Dr. David
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nguon v. Glynn et al
as 3:2021cv02113
Plaintiff:
Hung Duong Nguon
Defendant:
Mary Anne Glynn, Steven Roberts, John Hodges and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Thomas K. Mills v. State of California et al
as 2:2020cv10047
Defendant:
Arastou Aminzadeh, State of California, Dr. Maya Kumar and others
Plaintiff:
Thomas Kenneth Mills
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Mills v. State of California et al
as 1:2020cv01513
Defendant:
Dr. Arastou Aminzadeh, State of California, Dr. David Gellman and others
Plaintiff:
Thomas K. Mills
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Joseph v. Clayton
as 3:2019cv02139
Plaintiff:
Alonzo Joseph
Defendant:
Dr. David Clayton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Tilei v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al
as 3:2019cv01708
Defendant:
Dr. Peyman Shakiba, Jashua N. Doros, Dr. Saha and others
Plaintiff:
Punaofo Tsquito Tilei
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Lua v. Clayton
as 3:2019cv01169
Defendant:
Medical Dr. David Clayton
Plaintiff:
Hugo Lua
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Jared J. Marks v. Randolf Wilson et al
as 2:2019cv05238
Plaintiff:
Jared J. Marks
Defendant:
Randolf Wilson, Dr. Aye, Dr. David Loya and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
