Cases 1 - 7 of 7
McCarron v. United States of America et al
as 1:2018cv01903
Defendant:
Brian Gerson, Deborah Schult, Rame Awd and others
Plaintiff:
Frank McCarron
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Kendall v. Obama
as 17-1886
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Cyril Nathanaiel Kendall, The World's Most Suigeneris Man
Defendant - Appellee:
Lieutenant Olmo, Metropolitan, Unit Manager M. A. Facey, Metropolitan Dentention Center, Correctional Officer Frazier, Metropolitan Detention Center and others
Defendant:
Barack Hussein Obama, President of the United States of America, Loretta E. Lynch, Attorney General of the United States of America, Warden Maureen Baird, Metropolitan Correctional Center and others
Kendall v. Obama et al
as 1:2016cv05596
Defendant:
AHSA Metropolitan Dentention Center, Warden Maureen Baird, Dr. Michael Borecky and others
Plaintiff:
Cyril Kendall
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sessoms v. White et al
as 1:2014cv04408
Defendant:
Dr. Michael Borecky, P.A. Duncan, Mr. Georgi and others
Clinical Director:
Robin Edwin
Plaintiff:
Gary Sessoms
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Barnhill v. Duke et al
as 1:2012cv02420
Plaintiff:
Thomas Barnhill, Jr
Defendant:
Dr. Michael Borecky, Terrell Duke, Mr. Edwards and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gumbs v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 1:2011cv00857
Defendant:
Assistant Warden of Administrative Remedy of MDC-Brooklyn, Dr. Michael Borecky, Central Office Administrative Remedy Coordinator and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph Gumbs
All Defendants In Official And Unofficial Capacity:
Known and Unknown Bureau of Prisons Staff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Canario-Duran v. Borecky et al
as 1:2010cv01736
Defendant:
Dr. Michael Borecky, Mr. M. Ittayen and Physician's Assistant Nunez
Plaintiff:
Tirso Canario-Duran
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
