Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Frank Lamb, III v. ATF, et al
as 22-5038
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Frank Eugene Lamb, III
Defendant / Appellee:
Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives, United States Department of Homeland Security, Federal Bureau of Investigation and others
RUSHING vs. DRUG ENFORCEMENT ADMINISTRATION
as 1:2022cv00206
Plaintiff:
SHAUN RUSHING
Defendant:
DRUG ENFORCEMENT ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
LAMB v. BUREAU OF ALCOHOL, TOBACCO, FIREARMS AND EXPLOSIVES et al
as 1:2020cv03036
Defendant:
BUREAU OF ALCOHOL, TOBACCO, FIREARMS AND EXPLOSIVES, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION and others
Plaintiff:
FRANK EUGENE LAMB, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ADAMS v. UNITED STATES DRUG ENFORCEMENT ADMINISTRATION et al
as 1:2014cv00846
Plaintiff:
DALE BRENT ADAMS
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DRUG ENFORCEMENT ADMINISTRATION, MICHELE M. LEONHART, UNITED STATES NATIONAL SECURITY AGENCY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
O'CARROLL v. DRUG ENFORCEMENT ADMINISTRATION
as 1:2008cv01240
Plaintiff:
BESSIE O'CARROLL
Defendant:
DRUG ENFORCEMENT ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
RUIZ v. BUSH et al
as 1:2008cv00135
Plaintiff:
PAUL RUIZ
Defendant:
GEORGE W. BUSH, UNITED STATES CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY, NATIONAL SECURITY AGENCY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
v. MCKINNEY et al
as 1:2007cv01480
Plaintiff:
DUANE MCKINNEY
Defendant:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE and DRUG ENFORCEMENT ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 06-5139
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:1977cv00081
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
