Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Duffy Archive, LTD. v. Zwirek et al
as 4:2022cv00172
Plaintiff:
Duffy Archive, LTD.
Defendant:
Henry N. Zwirek and 3620 Washington Ave., LLC
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Talib et al v. Commonwealth of Massachusetts
as 4:2021cv02805
Plaintiff:
Jamhal Talib, Abdullah Bey, Will Musa and others
Defendant:
Medford State Police, Commonwealth of Massachusetts, Emily A. Karstetter and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
Hightower-Duffy v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 4:2020cv02143
Defendant:
Ethicon Inc and Johnson & Johnson
Plaintiff:
Karen Hightower-Duffy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
McCormack v. The Dutra Group, Inc.
as 3:2019cv00262
Defendant:
The Dutra Group, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Duffy B. McCormack
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
Duffy v. ConocoPhillips et al
as 4:2019cv02877
Plaintiff:
John Duffy
Defendant:
ConocoPhillips Company and ConocoPhillips
Duffy-Thompson v. Collier et al
as 4:2018cv01919
Plaintiff:
Marcus Anthony Duffy-Thompson
Defendant:
Bryan Collier, Tony O'Hare, Roberto M Herrera and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Georgetta Mirescu v. Intex Recreation Corp et al
as 3:2016cv00210
Plaintiff:
Georgeta Mirescu and Terence Duffy
Defendant:
Intex Recreation Corp , Intex Marketing Ltd. , Intex Corp. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Wallace v. Seelye
as 4:2010cv01223
Plaintiff:
Jason Duffy Wallace
Defendant:
William Lester Seelye
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Wallace v. Seelye DO NOT DOCKET IN (4:10-mc-146). ENTRIES SHOULD BE MADE IN THE RELATED CIVIL CASE.
as 4:2010mc00146
Plaintiff:
Jason Duffy Wallace
Defendant:
William Lester Seelye
James River Insurance Company v. John R Duffy, et al.
as 4:2010cv01082
Plaintiff:
James River Insurance Company
Defendant:
John R. Duffy and Mid-Continental Insurance Agency Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
