Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Heyward v. Dinkins et al
as 3:2023cv00570
Plaintiff:
L. M. Heyward
Defendant:
Veronica Dinkins, K. Plank, R Bauer and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Dunkle v. Warden of Marion Correctional Institution
as 3:2022cv00520
Petitioner:
David Dunkle
Respondent:
Warden of Marion Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Starr v. Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction et al
as 3:2019cv02934
Defendant:
John and Jane Does #1-3 ODRC Policymakers, Joseph Hughey, Warden Lyneal Wainwright and others
Plaintiff:
Sherwood Starr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Dunkle v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2016cv00240
Plaintiff:
Michael J. Dunkle
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
Shoop v. Mohr et al
as 3:2015cv02437
Plaintiff:
Frank Ray Shoop
Defendant:
Gary Mohr, Ed Voorhies, David Bobby and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shoop v. Mohr et al
as 2:2015cv02718
Plaintiff:
Frank Ray Shoop
Defendant:
Gary Mohr, Ed Voorhies, David Bobby and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mobley v. State of Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction et al
as 2:2013cv00286
Plaintiff:
James Mobley
Defendant:
State of Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction, Gary C Mohr, Gary R. Croft and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Martin v. Correction Institution Inspection Committee et al
as 5:2012cv00702
Plaintiff:
Robert Martin
Defendant:
Correction Institution Inspection Committee, CIIC Inspector Robinson, CIIC Director Saul and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dunkle v. Warden of Marion Correctional Institution
as 3:2011cv01638
Petitioner:
David Dunkle
Respondent:
Warden of Marion Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Dunkle v. Smith
as 3:2011cv01413
Petitioner:
Coy E. Dunkle
Respondent:
Keith Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
