Cases 21 - 29 of 29
BROOKS v. INGERSOLL-RAND COMPANY
as 2:2009cv92954
Plaintiff:
CHARLES E. BROOKS
Defendant:
INGERSOLL-RAND COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
BROOK et al v. A.P. GREEN INDUSTRIES, INCORPORATED et al
as 2:2009cv70482
Plaintiff:
JOHN E. BROOK, JOHN E. BROOK, VERIA BROOK and others
Defendant:
A.P. GREEN INDUSTRIES, INCORPORATED, ANCHOR PACKING COMPANY, INCORPORATED, ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INCORPORATED and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
BROOKS v. CROWN CORK & SEAL COMPANY INC.. et al
as 2:2009cv62416
Plaintiff:
ROY E. BROOKS, ROY E. BROOKS and ROY E. BROOKS
Defendant:
CROWN CORK & SEAL COMPANY INC.., GARLOCK INC., PITTSBURGH-CORNING CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
U.S. Bank N.A. v. Brooks et al
as 3:2008cv01823
Plaintiff:
U.S. Bank N.A.
Defendant:
Nicholas E. Brooks and Sabrina Gonzalez
Cause Of Action: Diversity
BROOKS v. OWENS-ILLINOIS, INC. et al
as 2:2008cv78060
Plaintiff:
AUBURN E. BROOKS, SR.
Defendant:
OWENS-ILLINOIS, INC., HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL, INC., GARLOCK, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
BROOKS v. ABCO INDUSTRIES, INC. et al
as 2:2008cv71122
Plaintiff:
PAUL E. BROOKS
Defendant:
ABCO INDUSTRIES, INC., AEROQUUIP INTERNATIONAL, INC., AEROQUIP CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
BROOKS v. ABCO INDUSTRIES, INC. et al
as 2:2008cv71121
Plaintiff:
PAUL E BROOKS
Defendant:
ABCO INDUSTRIES, INC., AEROQUUIP INTERNATIONAL, INC., AEROQUIP CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Brooks v. Patrick et al
as 3:2007cv01046
Petitioner:
Donald E Brooks
Respondent:
George Patrick and Tom Corbett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BULLOCK v. KLEIN et al
as 2:2007cv00621
Plaintiff:
ANDREW J. BULLOCK, IV
Defendant:
ARTHUR S. KLEIN, KENNETH O. SPANG, III, SCOTT F. WATERMAN and others
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
