Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Morgan v. Sykes Enterprises, Incorporated et al
as 1:2021cv06846
Plaintiff:
Anthony Morgan
Defendant:
Sykes Enterprises, Incorporated, Jeanne Beliveau-Dunn, Mark C. Bozek and others
Hittle v. Sykes Enterprises, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv06655
Plaintiff:
Mary Hittle
Defendant:
Sykes Enterprises, Inc., Mark Bozek, James S. Macleod and others
Whitfield v. Sykes Enterprises, Incorporated et al
as 1:2021cv06163
Plaintiff:
Matthew Whitfield
Defendant:
Sykes Enterprises, Incorporated, Mark Bozek, James S. Macleod and others
Stein v. Sykes Enterprises, Incorporated et al
as 1:2021cv06043
Plaintiff:
Shiva Stein
Defendant:
Sykes Enterprises, Incorporated, Mark Bozek, James S. Macleod and others
AKF, Inc. v. Evans et al
as 1:2021cv00440
Defendant:
Michael E. Evans Individually doing business as Sheltowee Farms and Sheltowee Land, LLC
Plaintiff:
AKF, Inc. doing business as Fundkite
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Moss v. Evans et al
as 9:2020cv00083
Defendant:
Lawrence R. Brown, Gregory A. Smith, Daniel E. Evans and others
Plaintiff:
Anthony Moss
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Evans et al v. Zimmer, Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv00696
Plaintiff:
Richard Evans and Lois E Evans
Defendant:
Zimmer, Inc., Zimmer Holdings, Inc. and Zimmer Orthopaedic Surgical Products, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Evans et al v. Merck & Co, Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv03904
Plaintiff:
Dawn Evans and Ermes E. Evans
Defendant:
Merck & Co., Inc. and Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Evans v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2012cv04736
Plaintiff:
Edwin E. Evans
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Evans v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 7:2012cv04736
Plaintiff:
Edwin E. Evans
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
