Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Wilson v. Santana et al
as 3:2023cv00250
Plaintiff:
Gerald J. Wilson
Defendant:
J. Santana, E. Frijas, M. Ortiz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Marlon Blacher v. Ralph Diaz, et al
as 22-55818
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARLON BLACHER, AKA Marlon Jessie Blacher
Defendant / Appellee:
RALPH DIAZ, W. L. MONTGOMERY, Acting Warden, ALL CALIPATRIA STATE PRISON ADMINISTRATIVE SEGREGATION CORRECTIONAL OFFICERS AND MEDICAL DEPARTMENT STAFFING PERSONS and others
Hearn v. Warden et al
as 3:2022cv00255
Plaintiff:
William Hearn
Defendant:
Warden, E. Frijas, M. Pollard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Roettgen v. Paramo et al
as 3:2021cv01285
Plaintiff:
John Roettgen
Defendant:
Daniel Paramo, A. Renteria, L.N. Romero and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Green v. Warden et al
as 3:2021cv00588
Plaintiff:
Michael Green and Kevin Dean Brewer
Defendant:
Warden, J. Garcia, J. Giurbino and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Blacher v. Diaz
as 3:2020cv01270
Defendant:
Ralph Diaz, Villa, M. Guevara Ortega and others
Plaintiff:
Marlon Blacher
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
(PC) Bradford v. Gee et al
as 2:2020cv00714
Plaintiff:
Raymond Alford Bradford
Defendant:
M. Lial, The State of California, S. Gee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Caudle v. California Department of Corrections & Rehabilitation et al
as 3:2020cv00098
Defendant:
Correctional Officer Romero, -, California Department of Corrections & Rehabilitation, E. Frijas and others
Plaintiff:
Ronald Edward Caudle
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Childs v. Paramo et al
as 3:2019cv00362
Defendant:
L. Garnica, Ladonna Munoz, Carie Covel and others
Plaintiff:
Earl Childs
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Black v. Le et al
as 3:2018cv02837
Defendant:
H. Le and E. Frijas
Plaintiff:
Darnell Black, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
