Cases 11 - 20 of 20
Hampton v. Brown et al
as 3:2014cv01901
Petitioner:
Robin S. Hampton, Robin G. Starr, James Bolson and others
Respondent:
E. G. Brown, Kamala Harris, Jeff Bears and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hampton v. Superior Court of San Francisco et al
as 3:2014cv00344
Petitioner:
Robin S. Hampton
Respondent:
Superior Court of San Francisco, E. G. Brown, State of California and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Smith v. Brown et al
as 3:2012cv03156
Petitioner:
Brian A. Smith
Respondent:
E. G. Brown, Mathew Cate and J. Kelso
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Higueret v. Brown et al
as 2:2011cv02734
Petitioner:
Steven Higueret
Respondent:
E G Brown and M. D. McDonald
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Higueret v. Brown et al
as 5:2011cv04804
Petitioner:
Steven Higueret
Respondent:
E. G. Brown and M. D. McDonald
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Pickett et al v. Brown
as 3:2011cv00445
Plaintiff:
N. Charles Pickett, Jr., William Earl Tolbert, William Little Anderson and others
Defendant:
E. G. Brown, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pombrio v. Schwarzenegger et al
as 5:2009cv02334
Petitioner:
Scott E. Pombrio
Respondent:
A. Schwarzenegger, E. G. Brown, G. J. Ahern and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Pombrio v. Schwarzenegger et al
as 5:2009cv02333
Plaintiff:
Scott E. Pombrio
Defendant:
A. Schwarzenegger, E. G. Brown, G. J. Ahern and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Eugene Orange v. Hedgepeth, et al
as 08-55464
Petitioner - Appellant:
EUGENE ORANGE
Respondent - Appellee:
HEDGEPETH, E. G. BROWN, Attorney General and JERRY BROWN, Attorney General of the State of California
Orange v. Hedgepeth et al
as 3:2007cv02066
Petitioner:
Eugene Orange
Respondent:
Hedgepeth and E G Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
