Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Downs v. Chipi et al
as 5:2016cv00466
Plaintiff:
Deangelo Jerome Downs
Defendant:
E. J. Chipi and Miguel A. Cintron
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cordes v. Chipi et al
as 5:2015cv00097
Plaintiff:
Dennis Eugene Cordes
Defendant:
E. J. Chipi, G. Colon, Olga Grajales and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Estrada v. Stewart et al
as 5:2012cv00149
Plaintiff:
Francisco Estrada
Defendant:
Denis Stewart, Kathy Smith, Pasco Regional Medical Center and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Estrada v. Stewart et al
as 8:2012cv00562
Plaintiff:
Francisco Estrada
Defendant:
Denis Stewart, Kathy Smith, Pasco Regional Medical Center and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hernandez-Cadena v. Kleckner et al
as 5:2009cv00464
Plaintiff:
Gabriel Hernandez-Cadena
Defendant:
M. Kleckner, R. McCollough, J. Agard and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Pinson v. Chipi et al
as 5:2009cv00283
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Pinson
Defendant:
E. J. Chipi, D. Montalvo and D. B. Drew
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Pinson v. Grimes et al
as 5:2009cv00238
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Pinson
Defendant:
J. Grimes, R. McCollough, L. Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Hernandez-Cadena v D.B. Drew et al
as 5:2009cv00190
Plaintiff:
Gabriel Hernandez-Cadena
Defendant:
D. B. Drew, M. Szafir, D. Montalvo and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Holz v. United States of America et al
as 8:2008cv02592
Plaintiff:
Timothy Edward Holz
Defendant:
United States of America, United States Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of Prisons and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Holz v. United States of America et al
as 5:2009cv00006
Plaintiff:
Timothy Edward Holz
Defendant:
United States of America, United States Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of Prisons and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
