Cases 1 - 10 of 27
West Coast Imports, Inc. v. Emson, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv08537
Counter Defendant:
West Coast Imports, Inc.
Defendant:
Emson, Inc.
Counter Claimant:
E. Mishan & Sons, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv02277
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12102
E. Mishan & Sons, Inc. et al v. RSA Group, LLC
as 1:2020cv07523
Defendant:
RSA Group, LLC doing business as As Seen on TV Pros
Plaintiff:
E. Mishan & Sons, Inc. and BHH LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Spin Master, Ltd. v. E. Mishan & Sons, Inc.
as 1:2019cv09035
Plaintiff:
Spin Master, Ltd.
Defendant:
E. Mishan & Sons, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 0001
Mack et al v. E. Mishan & Sons, Inc.
as 1:2019cv08233
Plaintiff:
Carl Mack and Alec Gable
Defendant:
E. Mishan & Sons, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 fr
E. Mishan & Sons, Inc. v. Promier Products Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv06999
Defendant:
Promier Products Inc. and Big Lots Stores, Inc.
Plaintiff:
E. Mishan & Sons, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Araujo v. E. Mishan & Sons, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv05785
Defendant:
ABC Corporation 1 through 10, EMSON USA, Robin Roe 1 through 10 and others
Plaintiff:
Araujo William and William Araujo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
E. Mishan & Sons, Inc. v. Tekno Products Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv01910
Defendant:
DOES 1-10, Tekno Products Inc., Ocean State Job Lot, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
E. Mishan & Sons, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 la
E. Mishan & Sons, Inc. v. Smart and Eazy Corp. et al
as 1:2018cv03217
Defendant:
Smart and Eazy Corp. and MasterPan, Inc.
Plaintiff:
E. Mishan & Sons, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
E. Mishan & Sons, Inc. v. Novel Brands LLC
as 1:2018cv02932
Plaintiff:
E. Mishan & Sons, Inc.
Defendant:
Novel Brands LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
