Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Jesus Eric Carasco v. E. Martin Estrada et al
as 8:2024cv00584
Plaintiff:
Jesus Eric Carasco
Defendant:
E. Martin Estrada and United States
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
Nancy Fiedler et al v. United States Department of Justice et al
as 2:2023cv00985
Plaintiff:
Nancy Fiedler, Matthew Guiney, Olga Faynshteyn and others
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, BUREAU OF ALCOHOL, TOBACCO, FIREARMS & EXPLOSIVES, E. MARTIN ESTRADA and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Jerry Martin v. J. Shartle, et al
as 21-15615
Defendant / Appellee:
UNKNOWN DRIVER, named as Lieutenant Driver, Shult, J. T. SHARTLE, Warden, FCC Tucson and UNKNOWN PARTIES, named as John Doe Medical Staff 1-20 and John Doe Bureau of Prisons Staff 1-20
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JERRY E. MARTIN
United States of America v. Haden E. Martin, Jr.
as 5:2020cv00996
Defendant:
Haden E. Martin, Jr.
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Rubenstein v. Financial Engines, Inc. et al
as 5:2018cv03542
Defendant:
Financial Engines, Inc., Blake R. Grossman, Joseph A. Grundfest and others
Plaintiff:
Jerry Rubenstein
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
USA v. Michael Martin
as 13-30288
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
MICHAEL E. MARTIN
Martin v. Lumetra Co., Inc.
as 4:2009cv03478
Plaintiff:
Jay E. Martin
Defendant:
Lumetra Co., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Martin v. National City Mortgage Co. et al
as 1:2008at00386
Plaintiff:
Donald E. Martin
Defendant:
National City Mortgage Co. and Cal-Western Reconveyance Corp.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Martin v. National City Mortgage Co. et al
as 1:2008cv01026
Plaintiff:
Donald E. Martin
Defendant:
National City Mortgage Co. and Cal-Western Reconveyance Corp.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
