Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Smith v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00197
Plaintiff:
Kasie E. Smith
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Smith et al v. American Red Cross of East Central Ohio
as 2:2023cv01867
Plaintiff:
David E. Smith and Sigrid Smith
Defendant:
American Red Cross of East Central Ohio
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Smith et al v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv02488
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Raymond E. Smith and Holly Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Smith et al v. Davol, Inc./C.R. Bard, Inc. Polypropylene Hernia Mesh Products Liability Litigation
as 2:2020cv00887
Plaintiff:
Suzanne E. Smith and Todd Smith
Defendant:
Davol, Inc./C.R. Bard, Inc. Polypropylene Hernia Mesh Products Liability Litigation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Smith v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv03205
Plaintiff:
Kevin E. Smith
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Smith v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv00429
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
William E. Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Smith et al v. Woolace Electric Corp. et al
as 3:2017cv02578
Plaintiff:
Thomas E. Smith and Menno Schwartz, Jr.
Defendant:
Woolace Electric Corp. , Steven Garza and Cory McManues
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Tum-Re El v. Van Saun et al
as 3:2015cv02708
Plaintiff:
Montu Hotep Tum-Re El
Defendant:
Bruce Van Saun, Brian E. Smith and Matthew Keel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Smith v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2015cv01169
Plaintiff:
Robert E Smith
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Smith v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2014cv01482
Plaintiff:
Timothy E. Smith
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
